monday, the 18th day of september 2023 / 27th bhadra, 1945. 02. v. The Kerala High Court has held that the tax effect in the appeals filed by the income tax department pertaining to assessment years 2006–07, 2007–08, 2008–09, 2009–10, and 2010–11 is 223 of 2022 honourable apex court dated 22. subsequent to the Kerala High Court ruling to instruct its offices to handle any situation arising out of the judgement in a sensitive manner as 11 in the Hon'ble Supreme Court against the said judgement. C. 17-07-2024 18-07-2024 19-07-2024 The Delhi High Court in its judgment delivered on 22nd May 2019 in the case of Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karamchari Sangh and Anr. MANAGING DIRECTOR KITEX GARMENTS LTD, KIZHAKKAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM-683 561, Dec 23, 2023 · On 10th July 2023, in the case of G. 51 180. Aug 3, 2021 · JUSTICE SHAJI P. respondent/accused: xxx xxx. 38 of 2024 petitioner/s: divya s. Public Interest Litigation petition was filed in the court comprising the following contentions; I. Reportable Judgment. Moyin v. The same are extracted below : Kerala High Court Prasanth vs C. WP(C) NO. 555/2 of Poyya Village in Kodungallur Taluk, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2nd respondent to grant the Kerala High Court in S. 189/2011 OF Kodenchery Police Station, Kozhikode. The E-FILING website enable people with visual impairments access the website using Oct 10, 2023 · The Hon’ble Kerala High Court, in the case of M/s. c. JACOB v. 415, S. nazar. 2007 at. 2. . Jun 18, 2018 · 13. Judgment dated April 26, 1971 upheld the majority judgment of the Kerala High Court in V. 29/2017 & 67/2017 of the Additional District and Sessions Court (for the trial of cases relating to Atrocities and Sexual Violence towards Women and Children) Kozhikode. Such restriction is also not Jul 6, 2023 · in the high court of kerala at ernakulam. State of Kerala [2013 (3) KLT 840]. 29769 of 2023 petitioner: diya 5. ,proprietor Share Link. 72 of 2021 against the order/judgment in op. manikumar & the honourable mr. JUSTICE SHAJI P. 5848/2022 & 3632/2023 8 Supreme Court, the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. r. WA NO. ,AGED 68 YEARS. 8. 2 ranjith r. 6 OF 2023; 23 January 2023 9 SCC 183, Full Bench judgment of this Court in ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company v. present. petitioner/s: jose paul, proprietor, alpha agencies, chappara, kodungaloor, thrissur district, pin - 680664. Free search by text or phrase is also available on this portal. At present, the sanctioned Judge strength of the High Court of Kerala is 35 Permanent Judges in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present the honourable mr. State Tax Office, Thalassery & Ors. 1607 OF 2020. justice k. Learn more on Kerala High Court interpretation on the law related to triple talaq and ruled that the criminal proceedings against a Muslim High Court of Kerala . son of poulose, aged 69 years, residing at thoppilan house, aimury. 1366/2021 [arising from the judgment dated 16. 17 July, 2024 | Kerala High Court. represented by the sub inspector of police, thrissur east police station, through the public prosecutor, high court of kerala - 682 031. 46/2023. justice dinesh kumar singh. Court Orders : Search by Case Number * Case Type Select Case Type Compulsory Field * Case Number * Year . 2019 passed by the High Court of Delhi]; in the high court of kerala at ernakulam. After having heard both sides, this Court is of the considered view that the statutory primacy should be given to the Basic Tax Register, which is the statutory document prepared in terms of the provisions contained in Rule 4 of the Kerala Land Tax Rules, 1972 framed under the provisions of Sec. petitioner : neethu, aged 29 years, May 24, 2023 · The petitioner is accused No. Orders to be issued in advance to avoid delay . k @ bilal IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM AMIT RAWAL; J. The forming of an Islamic Financing Company by KSIDC “is a clear instance of the State favouring particular religion”. Judges: K Abraham Mathew. 06. Court Orders:Search by Order Date. [WP (C) 30660 of 2023 dated September 19, 2023] allowed the writ petition and held that the difference between GSTR 2A and GSTR 3B is not a ground for denial of the claim for Input Tax Credit (“ITC”), thereby directed the Revenue Department to examine the evidence placed on record by J U D G M E N T. 2016 on a query being made by the Court, the learned 29 counsel for the State submitted that it wanted to place reliance on the original affidavit dated 13. We heard the arguments of learned counsel for the appellant/writ petitioner, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and also learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for respondents 3 to 5. According to the petitioner Jun 23, 2021 · in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present the honourable the chief justice mr. [arising from the judgment dated 12. 2023, along with crl. sangeetharaj. 1. C No. 16 per cent would need to be collected from all Feb 26, 2020 · state of kerala. 04. thursday, the 6 th day of july 2023 / 15th ashadha, 1945. m madhusoodanannair in the high court of kerala at ernakulam. by spl. 51 181 Court Orders : Search By Judge. 26. Kerala High Court - Year 2016 Main Search | Search Tips | About The Kerala High Court stands at the head of the judicial administration of the State of Kerala and the Union Territory of Lakshadweep. The State Government shall also take note of the suggestions in this judgment for the purposes of cultivating a healthy respect for animals among the people in our State. These Crl. OP(CRL. sreeji m. , the petitioners, who are the office bearers of an association by name “Muslim Ekopana Samidhi”, conducted a march to the High Court of Kerala, at Ernakulam, protesting against a judgment delivered by the Division Bench of High Court in a case known as Hadiya case. 262/2023 of Maradu Police Station registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 451, 354, 323, 509 & 34 of IPC. 2, 2022, 449 ITR 251 (p and H) Exhibit R1 (c) Copy of the judgment of the Kerala High Court dated 07. Get free access to the complete judgment in K. Gupta (supra) broadly on the same reasoning forming foundation of the judgment of the Kerala High Court. 11. The State Tax Officer of the Kerala High Court’s decision held that denying input tax credit to the petitioner based solely on the GSTR 2A Address. Bijoe Emmanuel & Others v. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695615. u. m. The appellants are the petitioners in a writ petition. 2016 taking the stand that the earlier affidavit was contrary to the judgment of the Kerala High Court. State Of Kerala. emmanuel. NO. 2020, the court on the same day passed the following: 1 in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present the honourable mr. n May 26, 2022 · PRESENT. ) NO. sri. P6 common order passed by the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode (for short, "the court below") forwarding the private complaints to the VACB, Kozhikode, for investigation u/s 156 (3) of Cr. CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. aged 41 years d/o sukumaran nair, adhil manzil, thekkada , vembayam. Commissioner. 380/2015 OF Thrikkakara Police Station , Ernakulam PETITIONER Nov 10, 2017 · Please sign up to generate summary. P. KRISHNANKUTTY MENON, MANIKKATH KIZHAKKETHIL. ,proprietor, adithya and ambadi traders, convent road nellivila p. In that case Division Bench had annulled In the meantime, the Supreme Court by its judgment dated April 26, 1971 in Kunjukutty Sahib v. The Kerala High Court stands at the head of the judicial administration of the State of Kerala and the Union Territory of Lakshadweep. Somarajan, J. 2006. A habeas corpus petition is a recourse in law that protects against illegal detention by ordering the person to be to be produced in court. THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA 1971 (As Amended upto 2019) Despatch of judgments and orders . PRESENT. 0484-2393903,0484-2393904. JUSTICE A. The petitioner, who is stated to be the absolute owner in possession of 24. harilal & the honourable mrs. justice dinesh kumar singh wednesday, the 3rd day of january 2024 / 13th pousha, 1945 wp(c) no. 89 OF 2020 28th day of October, 2022 XXXX v. State Of Kerala & Others. The petitions for special leave to appeal filed by the Employees 13 | P a g e Provident Fund Organization (“EPFO”) [SLP Feb 29, 2024 · IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. petitioner: xi, victim sc no. The Bench took note of the two affidavits dated 13. 2 days ago · please note : online/offline marking in causelist indicates mode of case filing. case having come up for admission on. 601 of 2015 of Palode Police station registered for the offences under Secs. 2016 and the contrary stands taken therein by the Government of Kerala. Jun 14, 2022 · The offences under section 228A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 being bailable, this application is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - S. tuesday, the 17 th day of october 2023 / 25th aswina, 1945. Nafeesa, 1972 KLT 785 negated the right of Muslim women to invoke extra-judicial divorce in light of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939. is under challenge in this Original Petition. mc. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH. the honourable mr. No. FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1941. 30 - Offence of sexual harassment -- Presumption of culpable mental state -- Held, culpable ment . police station. R. State of Kerala, Rep 1. THE HONOURABLE MR. The learned Judges referred to the decision of the Privy Council in Sashi Bhusan Misra v. this criminal misc. 2 The appeals arise out of a judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Kerala dated 12 March 2021 The High Court in . jenson francis payankan Search judgements given by High Court of Kerala by various criteria such as petitioner, respondent, judge and case number. C Nos. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 22. R. WEDNESDAY, THE 4 TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 14TH VAISAKHA, 1944. This Court in Jithu v. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders Kerala High Court 1006 (1) . MC. 46219/2019 [arising from the judgment dated 22. Case Number; FIR Number; Party Name; Advocate Name; Filing Number; Act Dec 9, 2023 · On January 12, 2016, Ashokan moved the first habeas corpus petition in the Kerala High Court. Mahendran v. Petitioner is accused in Crime No. public prosecutor. APPELLANT/3rd RESPONDENT: THE KERALA UNIVERSITY. 2007 and 05. Income Tax offficer. S. 34/2018 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, NJARAKKAL. 7. On April 9th 2018, it delivered the judgment, holding that the Kerala High Court could not have used Article 226 to annul the marriage of an adult. sujit kumar. V. The High Court comprises of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may, from time to time, appoint. justice a. 211/2018 of posco court, ernakulam, and crime no 1494/17 of north paravur . The Secretary, Travancore Devaswom Board, Thiruvananthpuram and others3 wherein similar contentions were raised. Anilkumar Bench: T. Nov 4, 2022 · The Division Benches of the Rajasthan and Delhi High Court followed the ratio of the decision in the case of R. M. CASE NO. SAHEER v. :—. tomson t. Before parting, we wish to acknowledge the able assistance rendered by all counsel who appeared in this case as also the amicus curiae Sri. WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 13TH POUSHA, 1945. We do not think that the appellant is entitled to any relief. No. O. DIVYA S. high court of kerala, pin - 682031. FROM * TO *. 9312 of 2024 3 judgment The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that he has been denied Input Tax Credit in the assessment of the Goods and Services Tax Act Feb 12, 2022 · 12 Feb 2022, 6:06 pm. respondents: Website Managed by e-Committee,High Court of Kerala Screen Reader Access ×. a. o. . 2021 IN WP(C) 27818/2019 OF HIGH COURT. Kerala-HIgh-Court-Judgement-WP-Civil-32386-of-2015-Judgement - Free download as PDF File (. 2018 passed by the High Court of Kerala]; (ii) SLP(C) Diary No(s). Vishakan v. 420 - Allegation that O R D E R. petitioner/s: pappachan. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. Thursday, the 26th day of May 2022 / 5th Jyaishta, 1944. reshmitha ramachandran (gp) this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 07. Union of India and Ors. The controversy came into force when a Single Judge of Kerala High Court in K. It was also held therein that if a case comes within the purview of section 124-A of the Act, then it is wholly irrelevant as to who was at fault. 35868 of 2018 petitioners: 1 saji s. 12. P3 notice, dated 30. other present: sri. Dec 21, 2023 · Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Another dated June. 2019 passed by the High Court of Delhi] along with connected matter being SLP(C) No. Anilkumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. Captcha Captcha * S2 Supreme Court Observer in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present the honourable mr. APPEAL No. The petitioner was a reporter for the ‘Mangalam Daily’, ‘Ujjaini’. p. CRL. 1: JOLLYAMMA JOSEPH @ JOLLY. 1494/2017 of north parur police station , ernakulam. 0484-2393901,0484-2393902. appeal. 2007. 5. PETITIONER: NEETHU. But Rule 92 of the CGST Rules states that where the IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM A. On Clicking the Search button, the current status and entire history of the Case will be shown. - The petitioner, a registered dealer, purchased certain goods from Chennai. On 23. petitioner: m/s. 765 OF 2021. 2478/2019 in op 987/2019 of family court, ernakulam . , venganoor thiruvananthapuram, pin 695 523. by adv. 2008 IN C. 03 August, 2015 · Petition filed under Section 439 Cr. 7 Crl. May 17, 2019 · in the high court of kerala at ernakulam. 2022 exhibit p4 the true copy of the notice issued by the 4th respondent dated 12. 698/2004 dated 15. hrithwik - sr. case having been finally heard on. 27993 OF 2015PETITIONER: 1 MATHEW ZACHARIAS, PRESIDENT, APPROCH INDIA, IDIYAKUNNEL, PUPALLY POST, WAYANAD DISTRICT, KERALA -673 579. 1986 OF 2006 2. It was held that under no circumstances, a muslim marriage could be dissolved Jul 25, 2019 · Janardhanan v. 2022 to all the state and counseling authorities directing them to scrupulously follow the conditions stipulated by the honourable apex court exhibit p5 the true copy of the relevant page of the High Court of Kerala . CHALY. 5678 of 2018] followed the view expressed by the Kerala High Court and quashed a circular issued A Division Bench of the Madras High Court in T. A NO. CLASS -II,THAMARASSERY. s. 11, S. State of Kerala [1972] S. TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1943. No fault can be found with the view taken by the High Court in its impugned judgment. State of Maharashtra (Laws (Bom) 1992 106), where it was held Nov 12, 2018 · Saji S. [in Writ Petition (C) No. 6660 OF 2017 PETITIONER: D. He had them transported to Kerala. global plasto wares, aged 44 years, 2/407, avinissery,thrissur, represented by its managing partner davis john, pin - 680027. The Board was also directed to file its explanation on that date. 05. Share this. At present, the sanctioned Judge strength of the High Court of Kerala is 35 Permanent Judges PDF Judgment; Free-Text Search Judgment and Order; Yearwise Judgment OF DELHI HIGH COURT; Address: Registrar General, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi Jan 9, 2017 · JUDGMENT. Case Status. 1 in Crime No. case of M/s Viswabharathi Medicals v. Phone. Henna Medicals vs. 2017 at about 11. OF FIRST CLASS ,KOLENCHERRY. May 6, 2021 · Controversy before the Court. 1,00,000/- with a default clause for rigorous imprisonment for six months. Get free access to the complete judgment in VIJAY BABU v. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & C. 23 of 2006 dated 01. Swaminathan v. On 7. thiruvananthapuram, pin – 695615. D Oct 13, 2017 · Various paragraphs from the judgment of the Kerala 24 (1983) 1 SCC 51 25 (1964) 1 SCR 561 : AIR 1963 SC 1638 26 AIR 1954 SC 388 : 1954 SCR 155 28 High Court have been referred to bolster the stand that such restriction imposed by the Davaswom Board is not violative of Articles 15, 25 and 26 of the Constitution. , padickalapara, perumbavoor, ernakulam, kerala-, pin state of kerala represented by the . p. 6. BADHARUDEENIN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENTTHE HON. 2. Oct 25, 2021 · Subsequently, Hadiya’s husband approached the Supreme Court to challenge the annulment. 2022 in the. KOCHI: At a time when the controversy over wearing hijab in schools rages in Karnataka, an order issued by the Kerala High Court regarding the matter in 2018 has 3 days ago · 2024 KHC OnLine 632. sri. ANILKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020 / 27TH SRAVANA, 1942 Crl. additional public prosecutor . The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner, a registered dealer under the provisions of the KVAT Act and now under the provisions of the CGST/SGST Act, for the following prayers: Feb 24, 2021 · JUSTICE SHAJI P. 368 of 2019. This case concerns four retired officers of Corporation Bank who have challenged the non-inclusion of special allowances in the calculation of their basic pension, which has resulted in a substantial reduction of their pension amounts. by advs. The trial court convicted the appellant under Sections 55 (a) and (b) of the Abkari Act and sentenced her thereunder to rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and a fine of Rs. REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OFFICE, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 034. The petitioners complained that singing the National Anthem offended their religious freedom. N. 2018. 155/2004 OF. Judgments/Orders Interim Orders Both. Chandrika, former Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board, to file their explanations in the matter and to be present in Court on 3rd of October, 1990. justice amit rawal. SABU M. Email Address The said stand was changed in the affidavit dated 5. justice dama seshadri naidu monday, the 12th day of november 2018 / 21st karthika, 1940 wp(c). In April 2021, the court overruled a 49-year-old verdict in K. CORAM 1. JUDGMENT. JUSTICE T. When the goods were in transit, the Assistant State Tax Officer (ASTO), for the reasons not germane here, detained the goods and issued the Ext. THE HONOURABLE DR. OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2 min read. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment of learned Single Judge, the appellant/writ petitioner is before this Court in this writ appeal. CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1942 WP(C). This is in conformity with the view of the Division Bench of Bombay High Court in Sudhir Suresh Kamble v. PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. BY ADVS. 07. no. 2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c)no. On March 8th 2018, the three-judge bench of Supreme Court set aside the annulment. Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. M. *Enter Captcha. 21167 OF 2023. aged 69 years. State of Kerala (2014 (3) KHC 77), had held that for constituting an offence under Section 25 of the Act, notification under Section 4 is mandatory. Apr 5, 2019 · against the order/judgment in sc 211/2018 of additional district court & sessions court (violence against women & children) crime no. If you know the of the Case, enter the 16 alphanumeric CNR Number without any – (hyphen) or space. Mobile View. Cs have been laid by CW1 in SC Nos. 2006, issued by the Registrar of the Co- operative Societies, Kerala stating that all the co-operative institutions coming under the administrative control of the Sep 3, 2021 · 992/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-11-2020 in CRLMA No. Neethu Joseph v. Bail Appl. 9. vs. 05. BINU, AGED 48 YEARS, ADVOCATE, 2ND FLOOR, FATHIMA PLAZA, PROVIDENCE ROAD, ERNAKULAM DIST. The issues involved in all these writ petitions are pertaining to the conduct of an “Unregulated Deposit Scheme” by Popular Group of Companies and its office bearers, directors, promoters etc. 03. 10. 1009 (1) May 28, 2020 · 7. 2024 KHC OnLine 631. DIAS, JJ. dias friday, the 09th day of april 2021 / 19th chaithra, 1943 mat. Feb 17, 2023 · Dated this the 17 th day of February, 2023 Ext. against the order dated 17-05-2019 in i. 300/2019 dated 24-12-2019 of family court, kalpetta appellant/s: muhammad musthafa b. Section 3 read with Section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 [for short 'the Act] and Annexure-4 Final Report in C. The prosecution allegation is that on 16. Notice was ordered to be issued to the complainant and Smt. 28 Ares of land comprised in Survey No. 2560 OF 2015 CRIME NO. 1807/2023 and connected cases, the court on the same day passed Oct 7, 2013 · A Full Bench of the Kerala High Court, in its judgment reported in AIR 2012 Ker 124, answered the question in the affirmative and upheld the Circular No. Raveendran Pilla v. 09. Kuriakose on 18 August, 2020 Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2020 KER 745 Author: T. AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10. OP (MAC) NO. MC. THE HONOURABLE MRS. S. UNION OF INDIA. However, once in court, Hadiya refused to go with her parents. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH. Dated this the 22nd day of April, 2022 The husband and his mother in a proceeding initiated by the wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short, the DV Act) are the revision petitioners. 30a. State of Madras, AIR 1971 Mad. 483, has also held that the ryotwari pattadar has no ownership in the minerals below the surface of the land. e-filed cases as online & physically filed cases as offline. v. In January 2019, EPFO had issued a circular9 directing that the additional contributions of 1. txt) or read online for free. 936 of 2021 IN MAT. Dama Seshadri Naidu, J. 2023, the petitioner surrendered before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-VIII, Ernakulam, the Jurisdictional Court. The court dismissed the petition and held that the petitioner had no locus standi to challenge the FIR. justice annie john. The theme of this appeal is the National Anthem of India. wednesday, the 19th day of june 2019 / 29th jyaishta, 1941 op (fc). JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by. wp(c) no. Nov 24, 2023 · Tellmy Jolly. pdf), Text File (. 3. justice c. 5 of the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961. CRIME NO. public prosecutor sri. Moyin vs Nafeesa and Others (1972) that barred Muslim women from dissolving their marriage through non-judicial Download latest eCourts Services Mobile App : Captcha. 294 (b), 307, 323 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code. STATE OF KERALA. Court’s Directive: Paragraph 8 of Diya Agencies v. 24 Nov 2023 4:00 AM GMT. Penal Code, 1860 - S. exercisethe of its revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731 upheld the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate2, Thiruvananthapuram declining to grant Nov 17, 2018 · Held: The Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in the case of Saji S Vs Commissioner, State GST Department Tax Tower, vide order no 35868 of 2018, dated November 12, 2018 ruled that as per section 77 of CGST Act, provides for the refund of the tax paid mistakenly under one head instead of another. ” Further, reference has also been made to a decision of the Kerala High Court in Ratheesh v. B. 29096 of 2023. Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2021 This is an appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Court, Fast Track Court II, Alappuzha in S. Thulasidas vs State Of Kerala. If you don’t know the CNR number of the case, then it can be searched 3. D/O SUKUMARAN NAIR, ADHIL MANZIL, THEKKADA , VEMBAYAM. P. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-V Nov 23, 2020 · A writ petition filed by a lawyer seeking quashing of FIR registered against him for allegedly cheating and defrauding a company. May 13, 2021 · Now, the old order has been reestablished with a landmark Kerala High Court judgment granting Muslim women the right to end their marriage through non-judicial divorce. Narayanan Nair v. State of Kerala (2023), the Kerala High Court asked the Station House Officer to file a report to elaborate on the circumstances under which the journalist’s mobile phone was seized by the police. ABDUL MAJEED, v. Fax: 0484-2391720, 0484-2562451. THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1945. 1/2020 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) REHANA FATHIMA @ FATHIMA AS Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS. Heard Ms N S Shamila learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Ms Jasmin M M learned Government Pleader for the parties. in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present the honourable mr. 1191 OF 2008. 143, 203-242, 274 & 309 of 1971). 226 OF 2022. muhamed mustaque & the honourable mr. Sukumaran, J. justice dinesh kumar singh tuesday, the 12th day of september 2023 / 21st bhadra, 1945 wp(c) no. Nov 22, 2018 · On 29. The petition came up before us on 24-9-1990. The wife who is the 2nd respondent herein filed a petition at the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kollam (for Kerala High Court Judgement on Islamic Banking - Free download as PDF File (. S/O. AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ST 2815/2018 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE. PETITIONER: SURENDRAN M. 33787 of 2023. 364 (Civil Appeals Nos. Sunil Thomas, J. 12. XXXXX Against the Judgment in Mat Oct 2, 2023 · The court emphasized that ITC claims in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime cannot be dismissed solely due to differences in GSTR 2A and GSTR 3B. Prabhakaran Vijaya Kumar, 2008 ACJ 1895 (SC), contended that the Supreme Court had held that section 124-A of the Act lays down strict liability or no fault liability in case of railway accidents. High Court of Kerala Ernakulam, 682031. STATE OF KERALA on CaseMine. AGAINST THE ORDER IN CP 1/2020 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST. 14180 of 2023. C. qz vk sp bv ld ct ia bl py pt